Lessons from the Delta in Achieving Universal Banking

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published by NPQ online on Feb.  2. It is used here with permission.

By Bill Bynum and Ed Sivak

Bill Bynum

In 1994, a group of business, nonprofit, and philanthropic leaders came together to form the Enterprise Corporation of the Delta, a loan fund created to improve lives in 55 opportunity-starved counties in the tristate Mississippi Delta region. 

Toda, the organization now known as HOPE is a full-service financial institution and policy institute that has expanded to cover five Deep South states (Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee) and still embodies the principles upon which it was founded. 

One of us (Bill Bynum) was the organization’s founding CEO. The other (Ed Sivak), joined in 2001 and serves as chief policy and communications officer.

Ed Sivak

At HOPE, financial services are our primary tool for ensuring that factors such as race, gender, and geography do not limit one’s ability to support one’s families and communities. Roughly half of people who have a checking account, home mortgage, or business loan with HOPE were previously unbanked or underbanked. Many had relied on high-cost, often predatory, financial service providers. From the beginning, our efforts to achieve a society where everyone has access to basic banking services.

As john a. powell and his colleagues put it, targeted universalism involves “setting universal goals pursued by targeted processes to achieve those goals…. The strategies developed to achieve those goals are targeted, based upon how different groups are situated within structures, culture, and across geographies to obtain the universal goal.”

The concept of “targeted universalism” may be of recent origin, but our work has long been geared towards the ideas embraced by that theory.

Setting the Stage: Understanding the Gaps 

Targeted universalism aspires to establish universal goals and then design targeted approaches to realize those goals. And one cannot understand targeted approaches without a deep appreciation for the communities we serve. In 2020, HOPE made 5,910 loans totaling $160.4 million. At HOPE, 81% of our members are Black or Latinx, 74% have incomes below $50,000, and 59% of our members are women.

The chart below offers national data that illustrates the enormous gaps in simple access to banking services that remain between white, Latinx, and Black borrowers.

Banking status is vital to building wealth, stabilizing households, and fortifying families against financial headwinds. Low-income families that are banked are more likely to own wealth-building assets (such as homes and businesses) than those who are unbanked. Even with very low balances, the presence of savings can play a major economic security role. 

Just $250 may be the difference between encountering an eviction or utility shutoff; or being protected from one. Likewise, children from low-income families with savings accounts experience higher college enrollment and graduation rates, relative to families of similar means without savings accounts.

When it comes to buying homes, one-out-of-four Black mortgage applicants and nearly one-out-of-five Latinx applicants have their loan applications denied. For white borrowers, this figure is just 14%.

Striking Disparity

In Mississippi, Black mortgage applicants earning over $150,000 a year have their applications denied at a higher rate than white applicants earning between $30,000 and $50,000. Beyond the obvious wealth-building aspects, homeownership has been shown to contribute to better health outcomes, reduced high school dropout rates, and increased civic participation.

Similar patterns persist in small business lending. Only 13% of Black-owned and 20% of Latinx-owned businesses reported receiving the full share of financing requested from banks, compared to 40% for white-owned firms. Not surprisingly, Black firms cited lack of credit access as “the single most important challenge firms expect to face as a result of the pandemic” at a rate 2.5 times higher than for white firms.

The disparities are particularly disturbing given the evidence that business ownership both reduces poverty and narrows the racial wealth gap.

Targeting the Response 

In the U.S., affluent people rely on private bankers as financial problem-solvers. But few people of color and people with lower incomes have this luxury. HOPE places a priority on being the private banker for those who languish in banking deserts across the Deep South.

Closing banking gaps requires being accessible. Of HOPE’s 24 branches, 20 are located in majority Black counties or parishes, and seven are in rural communities with fewer than 10,000 people. The median poverty rate in our communities is 33%, and in many places, HOPE is the only depository with a local branch. 

HOPE’s staff, management and governance also reflect a commitment to the people and places we serve. Roughly 68% of HOPE’s employees are people of color and 72% are women. Sixty% of management positions are filled by people of color and 62% by women. The majority of HOPE’s board members are people of color.

Access is also created by offering products and services designed to mitigate the social, economic, and systemic barriers facing those we serve. With Black family wealth being one tenth of white family wealth, Black households must overcome the absence of available cash. In response, HOPE structures programs that offer assistance with down-payments, covers closing costs, and finances up to 100% of the home value.

Achieving Access

Access is also achieved through the credit decision-making process. Bias within automated underwriting algorithms, particularly for mortgage loans, is well documented. While algorithms speed decision-making, the efficiencies are drawn from data that reflect ongoing discrimination, as well as the long period when housing discrimination was codified in law.

Given the limitations of automated underwriting, HOPE manually underwrites every mortgage. During the review process, special consideration is given to medical debt, which falls disproportionately on people of color. HOPE considers non-traditional sources of credit information—such as rent, utility, and mobile phone payment histories—in lieu of traditional credit scores. 

For those who are not yet ready to take on a mortgage, HOPE offers credit-building products and financial advisory services.   This approach enables HOPE to originate over 80% of its mortgages to people of color, over five times the rate of other Mississippi banks and credit unions.

Taking Role Seriously

All of these strategies are anchored in on-the-ground feedback and data. HOPE takes seriously its accountability to the credit union’s member-owners. The members elect directors and serve on local advisory councils that inform product and service design and outreach strategy.

Through the HOPE Community Partnership, HOPE works with local stakeholders to identify community priorities and develop strategic plans for improving local conditions. For example, residents of Drew, Miss., population 1,927, used this forum to develop plans to repurpose an abandoned armory to expand access to healthy, nutritious food. As a result, the facility has been converted into a food distribution center with cold storage that also provides health screenings, nutrition education, cooking classes, meal planning, and budgeting. 

In other communities, new affordable housing, parks, lighting projects, and murals are some of the projects that came to fruition through this process.

CDFIs: A Targeted Approach 

Far too often, the financial sector views people of color as liabilities to be managed rather than assets to be developed. Large gaps in financial service access, persisting over generations, bear out the consequences of government and private sector policies and practices that perpetuate this outcome.

As COVID-19 upended lives and the economy, it quickly became clear that federal responses like the U.S. Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) were not designed to meet the needs of Black, Indigenous, and other business owners of color. Not only did PPP rely on traditional banks as the delivery system, but sole proprietorships, which account for more than 90% of all Black businesses were ineligible in the program’s initial phase.

These structural inequities devastated already undercapitalized entrepreneurs of color, and they suffered an initial closure rate of 40% compared to 17% for white-owned businesses as a result.

HOPE was one of several community development financial institutions(CDFIs) and minority financial institutions (MFIs) that stepped into the breach, successfully advocating to open the program to sole proprietors, and processing 5,216 PPP loans—89% of which went to borrowers of color and 50% to women. The average amount of these forgivable loans was a modest $26,814, over $40,000 less than the program average nationwide.

Unprecedented Funding

The PPP experience, combined with ongoing economic and social justice upheaval, have prompted federal policy makers to make unprecedented funding available to equip CDFIs and MFIs to fill gaps in the banking system. This year, HOPE was among hundreds of such institutions that shared $1.75 billion in grants from the CDFI Fund. And we are awaiting decisions on the distribution of $9 billion in equity from the Emergency Capital Investment Program, administered by the Treasury Department. 

The outsized contributions of CDFIs and MFIs to an inclusive recovery underscores the importance of increased and targeted investment by banks, private industry, philanthropy, and government to fortify this vital segment of the financial system.

At the same time, along with increased resources and opportunities, come new levels of complexity. As CDFIs and MFIs position themselves to deploy exponentially more capital, they must be steadfast in prioritizing a commitment to community development, over the countervailing forces of maximizing efficiencies and profit that characterize traditional banks. 

Similarly, investors must be circumspect in making their decisions. Because, just as the billions of dollars in capital flowing into this sector has the potential to dramatically close opportunity gaps, the reverse is also true. Evidence of this can be found in Mississippi, the state with the most CDFIs in the nation—a status achieved when community banks in the state tapped into record amounts of federal CDFI funding after the 2008 financial crisis. 

However, a 2021 analysis showed that the rate of mortgage lending to Black borrowers by CDFI banks in Mississippi is less than 13%, lower than the 17% rate of all mortgage lenders that report Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data—in a state where the Black population is nearly 40%.

In the Collective Interest

As people of color become America’s emerging majority, universal banking is in the nation’s collective interest. A recent McKinsey study found that closing the racial wealth gap could increase US gross domestic product (GDP) between $1 and $1.5 trillion by 2028.

Sustained and targeted investment in CDFIs and MFIs with demonstrated a commitment to serving people of color is a proven solution for setting the nation on a path toward inclusive economic prosperity.

Bill Bynum is CEO of Hope Credit Union and Ed Sivak is chief policy and communications officer.

 

 

Section: Standard
Word Count: 2095
Copyright Holder: CUToday.info
Copyright Year: 2026
Is Based On:
URL: https://cuto-admin.flux5.ccplatform.net/THE-tude/Lessons-from-the-Delta-in-Achieving-Universal-Banking