WASHINGTON—The Federal Trade Commission has joined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in filing an amicus brief in a case in an appeals court that seeks to overturn a lower court’s decision that could create an exception to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
The case, Ingram v. Experian, is in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and would allow furnishers of credit information to decline to investigate when consumers dispute inaccurate information in certain circumstances.
The brief asks the appeals court to overturn a lower court’s decision that could create an exception to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) allowing furnishers of credit information to decline to investigate when consumers dispute inaccurate information in certain circumstances. The brief argues that the holding could undercut a key protection provided by the FCRA that allows consumers to dispute and correct inaccurate information in their credit reports, the FTC said.
“The law gives consumers a right to dispute inaccurate information and have their claim investigated,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The FTC-CFPB brief rejects the argument that there are circumstances when furnishers do not have to follow the law.”
Two Avenues in FCRA
The FTC noted the FCRA provides consumers with two avenues for disputing the accuracy of their credit information that furnishers provide to credit reporting agencies. Consumers can file a dispute directly with furnishers or file a dispute indirectly with the credit reporting agencies, which may refer the dispute to the furnishers.
The FTC and CFPB amicus brief relates to a case involving a request made by a consumer to a furnisher, Comcast Communications, to remove an account from his credit report that was listed as delinquent.
“The consumer reported to Comcast that he was the victim of identity theft and did not open the account. Comcast rejected this claim after it said the consumer failed to submit proof of his identity theft and later referred the matter to a debt collector,” the FTC said. “The consumer later made what is considered an indirect dispute by disputing the delinquent account with the credit reporting agency Experian, which sent the dispute to the debt collector, as the furnisher of the inaccurate information.”
In response to litigation from the consumer, the lower court ruled in favor of the debt collector, saying that the furnisher is only obligated to investigate “bona fide” indirect disputes and may therefore decline to investigate any dispute it deems frivolous.
Brief Arguments
The FTC and CFPB, however, claim that the lower court erred, arguing in their brief that:
Furnishers are Required to Investigate. The brief argues that there is nothing in the text of the FCRA that suggests that a furnisher can choose not to investigate indirect disputes if it deems them to be not “bona fide.” The statutory text is unambiguous: furnishers must investigate all indirect disputes, according to the brief.
Consumers Would Be Left in the Dark. Under the FCRA, consumers are entitled to be notified about the outcome of their disputes and must be given an opportunity to address any problems with their dispute claims, the FTC said. The district court’s ruling would circumvent those requirements, leaving consumers in the dark and undercutting a central remedy under the FCRA that ensures consumers are able to dispute and correct inaccurate information on their credit reports.
Exception is Unnecessary. The exception created by the lower court’s decision is unnecessary because furnishers are already protected in other ways from having to investigate a frivolous dispute. For example, the FCRA requires credit reporting agencies to determine if a dispute is frivolous before forwarding a dispute to the furnisher, according to the FTC.
The Very Best in CU Reporting. For You. For Free. Or Your Money Back.
Don’t forget to check your Spam/Junk email folder if you haven’t been receiving your free, popular and daily CUToday.info news headlines.
And if you haven’t yet signed up for the new email solution on which CUToday.info has partnered with ResponseGenius, you can do so here. Signing up requires less than one minute of your time.
CUToday.info has received very positive response from readers following the move to an improved provider of the daily headlines, but many also noted they did need to go to their Spam/Junk folder and mark it as safe.
The new email solution has not only improved every reader’s delivery experience, but it also features a fresh, new format that is easy to read, especially on mobile devices.
Please note and/or make your IT department or email administrator aware the emails will be coming from the domains CUTodayinfo.com and CUTodayinfoReply.com.