WASHINGTON–The Federal Trade Commission has joined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in filing an amicus brief that asks the appeals court to overturn a lower court decision that denied servicemembers the right to sue to invalidate a contract that they allege violates the Military Lending Act.
The brief was filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the case of Louis v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.
“The district court erred, the brief argues, and its ruling could undermine enforcement of the Military Lending Act, a law designed to protect military families from predatory lending,” the CFPB and FTC said. “Servicemembers are particularly vulnerable to predatory practices, which can undermine military readiness and morale.”
According to the government, the act includes provisions that establish rules governing the types of loans that creditors can issue to active duty servicemembers and their dependents, and also requires that creditors provide servicemembers certain information before issuing a loan. Under the law, any agreement that violates the act is void from the moment that it was signed.
As the two government agencies stated, the FTC and CFPB amicus brief relates to a case involving an active-duty servicemember and his spouse (Emmanuel and Tamarah Louis), who challenged a contract they signed with timeshare company Bluegreen that they allege was illegal under the law. The district court dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the Louis family did not have the legal right to sue because they “[failed] to identify any concrete harm they have experienced as a result of the statutory violations.”
‘Legal Right to Challenge’
“The brief argues that Mr. and Mrs. Louis have a legal right to challenge the contract in court because they suffer harm from their ongoing obligations under the contract, which they have claimed was illegal under the Military Lending Act,” the FTC said. “Specifically, they claim that the contract contains an illegal mandatory arbitration clause and that it failed to provide required disclosures regarding the annual percentage rate of interest for the loan (known as the Military Annual Percentage Rate).”
The brief also argues that the Mr. and Mrs. Louis sufficiently alleged that the court could remedy their injuries by declaring the contract invalid and awarding restitution or damages.
The Very Best in CU Reporting. For You. For Free. Or Your Money Back
Don’t forget to check your Spam/Junk email folder if you haven’t been receiving your free, popular and daily CUToday.info news headlines.
And if you haven’t yet signed up for the new email solution on which CUToday.info has partnered with ResponseGenius, you can do so here. Signing up requires less than one minute of your time.
CUToday.info has received very positive response from readers following the move to an improved provider of the daily headlines, but many also noted they did need to go to their Spam/Junk folder and mark it as safe.
The new email solution has not only improved every reader’s delivery experience, but it also features a fresh, new format that is easy to read, especially on mobile devices.
Please note and/or make your IT department or email administrator aware the emails will be coming from the domains CUTodayinfo.com and CUTodayinfoReply.com.