WASHINGTON—Credit unions must receive parity with banks in any deposit reform legislation, CUNA wrote to House Financial Services and Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee leadership.
Congress and the Federal Reserve have indicated interest in deposit insurance reform in the wake of recent high-profile bank collapses. The issue was also addressed recently by NCUA Chairman Todd Harper, as CUToday.info reported here.
“Our primary concern regarding any deposit insurance reform legislation passed by Congress is to ensure that credit unions receive parity, fair treatment, and equal protection with banks,” the letter reads. “CUNA is also concerned with any potential legislative impact on the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) and resulting effects on the equity ratio and capital requirements required by the Federal Credit Union Act and implemented by the NCUA.”
‘Healthy & Stable’
According to CUNA, credit unions are healthy and stable, with the trade group citing CUs’ net-worth-to-asset and equity capital ratios, as well as the fact more than 91% of credit union deposits remain insured (with the remaining 9% representing deposits that exceed the federal maximum deposit insurance amount).
“It is imperative that, should Congress amend the law and increase [the maximum deposit insurance amount], credit union members should continue to receive parity with account holders at banks,” the letter reads. “In addition, Congress is reportedly considering proposals to provide deposit insurance coverage for business transactional accounts at financial institutions. These accounts have daily balances that fluctuate frequently based on receipts, payments, payroll, and the many other transactions that occur in the normal cycle of business activity…The traditional model of fixed deposit insurance may not be the best way to insure such accounts. Should Congress direct the bank’s DIF to provide higher or unlimited coverage for such accounts, the Committee should provide reciprocal instructions pertaining to the NCUSIF.”
Effects of Mandatory Capital Rules
CUNA also encouraged Congress to consider the effect increased amount and scope of deposit insurance will have on mandatory credit union capital requirements.
“During difficult economic times and with uncertainty surrounding many banks, it would be an absolute travesty for any credit union to have to display ‘no deposits’ signs in its lobby,” the letter reads. “Statutory changes should be made to modernize or radically change this PCA structure for credit unions in the event of legislation on deposit insurance reform. Such changes could include changing the capitalization definitions that initiate regulatory intervention.”
Feeling the FOMO Fever? CUToday.info Has a Prescription
Are you missing out on the latest news in credit unions? Missing the trends and developments you need to be aware of? We can help. Each morning CUToday.info delivers its daily Fresh Today news update offering the latest headlines and breaking news right to your email, with the easy-to-read headlines format allowing you to click on the stories that interest you most in order to learn more.
And it’s free!
If you haven’t yet signed up for the new email solution on which CUToday.info has partnered with ResponseGenius, you can do so here. Signing up requires less than one minute of your time—and it’s free!
Please note that after signing up you may need to go to your Spam/Junk folder and mark the morning headlines email as safe. CUToday.info does not provide its list of readers and emails to outside parties, and we will not be contacting you to sell you an extended warranty or sending you any links so you may cash in on an inheritance you didn’t know was coming.
And did we mention it’s free?
Please note and/or make your IT department or email administrator aware the emails will be coming from the domains CUTodayinfo.com and CUTodayinfoReply.com