WASHINGTON—CUNA and NAFCU have joined with other organizations have to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in opposition to its recent proposal to create a public registry of companies that use certain contract terms and agreements, most significantly, arbitration agreements.
The core of this proposed rule is a “wholly impermissible and unjustified attack on arbitration agreements that violates the Dodd-Frank Act and the Congressional Review Act (CRA), as well as the protections for arbitration agreements that Congress put in place when it enacted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA),” the letter reads.
“The proposed rule would brand companies as ‘risky’ to consumers merely for exercising their federally protected right to use arbitration, or otherwise engaging in fully lawful and appropriate conduct—making those companies a special focus of the Bureau’s supervisory and enforcement activities just because they use arbitration to resolve consumer disputes,” the letter states. “The Bureau’s proposal offers no basis for that conclusion.”
6 ‘Overarching Reasons’
The letter highlights what the signatories say are six “overarching reasons” the CFPB should not promulgate the rule:
- The CFPB lacks legal authority to impose such burdens on the use of arbitration agreements, as a CUNA-supported Congressional Review Act resolution disapproved the CFPB’s prior attempt to limit the use of arbitration
- The proposal’s targeting of arbitration is “arbitrary, capricious, and irrational,” based on the false premises that arbitration is risky for consumers and its use makes companies more likely to violate federal consumer protection laws
- The CFPB has not offered justification for regulating the non-arbitration contractual terms that it is targeting, instead acknowledging the only data supporting the proposal involves arbitration
- The CFPB’s cost-benefit analysis is “woefully inadequate,” including ignoring the most serious costs associated with the proposal
- The CFPB should not promulgate such a “burdensome” rule while the U.S. Supreme Court is deciding on the constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure
- Should the CFPB promulgate the rule, it should narrow it significantly and limit it to contract terms on which there is “overwhelming consensus of their unlawfulness”
CUNA Files Additional Letter
CUNA filed an additional comment letter with the CFPB on the proposal, calling for the CFPB to expressly exempt affiliates of insured credit unions from being subject to the registry, as many of those affiliates are already subject to the CFPBs robust supervision and examination program, CUNA added.
Feeling the FOMO? We Can Help
The biggest, best and freshest news reporting in credit unions remains free in ’23! Each morning CUToday.info delivers its daily Fresh Today news update offering the latest headlines and breaking news right to your email, with the easy-to-read headlines format allowing you to click on the stories that interest you most in order to learn more.
If you haven’t yet signed up for the new email solution on which CUToday.info has partnered with ResponseGenius, you can do so here. Signing up requires less than one minute of your time—and it’s free!
Please note that after signing up you may need to go to your Spam/Junk folder and mark the morning headlines email as safe. CUToday.info does not provide its list of readers and emails to outside parties, and we will not be contacting you to sell you an extended warranty or sending you any links so you may cash in on an inheritance you didn’t know was coming.
And did we mention it’s free?
Please note and/or make your IT department or email administrator aware the emails will be coming from the domains CUTodayinfo.com and CUTodayinfoReply.com