WASHINGTON—The CFPB is being urged by NAFCU to expand the reach of a proposed rule to require covered nonbanks that are under final public orders from a federal, state, or local agency in connection with a consumer financial product or service to report the existence of such orders to a Bureau registry.
The Bureau is also proposing to require certain supervised nonbanks to submit annual written statements regarding compliance with each underlying order, signed by an attesting executive who has knowledge of the entity's relevant systems and procedures for achieving compliance and control over the entity's compliance efforts.
NAFCU Regulatory Affairs Counsel James Akin submitted comments to the Bureau, with the trade group expressing support for making the orders public and holding covered entities accountable through annual attestations of compliance. However, Akin said NAFCU wants the CFPB to conduct additional supervision over underregulated nonbanks, including fintechs, by exercising its authority over larger participants in the consumer financial market.
‘Level Playing Field’
“NAFCU encourages all relevant regulators to ensure that when fintechs compete with traditional financial institutions, they do so on a level playing field where smart regulations and consumer protections apply to all actors in the consumer marketplace,” wrote Akin.
In the comment letter, Akin suggested such a registry has the “potential to capture the conduct of those fintechs and nonbanks that lack supervision,” and clearly demonstrate their inability to comply with consumer protection laws, which would make the case as to whether they should be brought under federal supervision.
According to NAFCU, the registry would also serve as a disincentive for fintechs that might otherwise violate consumer financial protection laws and allow traditional financial institutions, such as credit unions, to have a central repository of information regarding the conduct of nonbank covered persons to better inform them when choosing to partner with these entities.
‘Strong Objection’
Akin added NAFCU “strongly” objects to the proposal’s suggestion that the Bureau “might at some point consider collecting or publishing the information described in the proposal” from credit unions. Credit unions already complete necessary and reporting as part of their adherence to NCUA’s reporting standards.
Attempts to require credit unions to fulfill this additional level of reporting as required by this proposal would be “burdensome, duplicative, and wholly unnecessary,” Akin noted.