WASHINGTON—The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has issued guidance about two junk fee practices it said “are likely unfair and unlawful under existing law.”
The first, according to the CFPB, are “surprise overdraft fees,” which it said includes overdraft fees charged when consumers had enough money in their account to cover a debit charge at the time the bank authorizes it.
The second is the practice of indiscriminately charging depositor fees to every person who deposits a check that bounces, the Bureau said, adding the penalty is an “unexpected shock to depositors who thought they were increasing their funds.”
The Bureau said overdraft and depositor fees likely violate the Consumer Financial Protection Act prohibition on unfair practices when consumers cannot reasonably avoid them.
The CFPB said its Consumer Financial Protection Circular on surprise overdraft fees and the its compliance bulletin on surprise depositor fees lay out when a financial institution’s back-end penalties likely break the law.
In response to the CFPB announcement, John McKechnie, senior partner with the Washington advocacy firm Total Spectrum, said, “Director (Rohit) Chopra has been nothing if not clear and transparent about his views on the whole cluster of overdraft/NSF/checking account issues since his first discussion last December. The term ‘junk fees’ was a clue that was hard to miss. Knowing that this has been coming probably doesn’t make it easier for credit unions and other financial institutions to swallow though.”
Surprise Depositor Fees
“When a consumer deposits a check that bounces, banks sometimes charge a fee to the depositor, usually in the range of $10 to $19,” the CFPB said. “However, a person trying to deposit a check has no idea or control over whether the check will clear, and sometimes, that person is the victim of check fraud. In fact, there are many reasons deposited checks can bounce, and the most common reason is that the check originator does not have enough money available in their account.
“Charging a fee to the depositor penalizes the person who could not anticipate the check would bounce, while doing nothing to deter the originator from writing bad checks.”
The CFPB said its bulletin explains that indiscriminately charging these depositor fees, regardless of circumstances, likely violates the Consumer Financial Protection Act.
“Financial institutions can generally stay on the right side of the law when they employ more tailored fee policies that charge depositor fees only in situations where a depositor could have avoided the fee, such as when a depositor repeatedly deposits bad checks from the same originator,” the CFPB said.
Surprise Overdraft Fees
According to the CFPB, an overdraft fee can become a surprise fee when the customer doesn’t reasonably expect their actions to incur an overdraft fee.
“For instance, even if a person closely monitors their account balances and carefully manages their spending to avoid overdraft fees, they can easily incur penalties when financial institutions employ processes that are unintelligible or manipulative,” the CFPB said.
Additional Information
The CFPB said the Circular explains that when financial institutions charge surprise overdraft fees, sometimes as much as $36, they may be breaking the law.
“The circular provides some examples of potentially unlawful surprise overdraft fees, including charging penalties on purchases made with a positive balance,” the CFPB said. “These overdraft fees occur when a bank displays that a customer has sufficient available funds to complete a debit card purchase at the time of the transaction, but the consumer is later charged an overdraft fee.
“Often, the financial institution relies on complex back-office practices to justify charging the fee,” the CFPB continued. “For instance, after the bank allows one debit card transaction when there is sufficient money in the account, it nonetheless charges a fee on that transaction later because of intervening transactions.”
Prior Action
The CFPB noted that in September 2022 it took action against Regions Bank for charging surprise overdraft fees known as authorized positive fees. As early as 2015 the CFPB added that it, as well as other federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve, began cautioning financial institutions against charging certain types of authorized positive fees, such as the ones used by Regions to unlawfully penalize customers.
Regions is required to, among other consequences, reimburse consumers all the funds it unlawfully charged since August 2018 and pay a $50 million penalty.
Junk Fee Initiative
As CUToday.info previously reported, in January 2022 the CFPB launched an initiative to scrutinize back-end junk fees that it said cost Americans billions of dollars. Tens of thousands of people responded to a CFPB Request for Information with their stories and complaints about unnecessary fees in banking.
Since then, the CFPB noted it has taken action to constrain “pay-to-pay” fees, and has announced a rulemaking proceeding on credit card late fees. In the last year, the CFPB has also published several research reports on overdraft fees and an analysis of college banking products.
The CFPB added that it has observed that financial institutions have started to compete more when it comes to fees.